Date: Wed, 2 Oct 1996 13:36:13 +0900 (JST) From: Michael Hancock <michaelh@cet.co.jp> To: Chris Csanady <ccsanady@friley216.res.iastate.edu> Cc: Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org>, hackers@freebsd.org Subject: NTFS (was Re: VPS mailing list, BSD interest?) Message-ID: <Pine.SV4.3.93.961002133035.3204B-100000@parkplace.cet.co.jp> In-Reply-To: <199610020106.UAA05994@friley216.res.iastate.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 1 Oct 1996, Chris Csanady wrote: > >> NTFS also uses b-trees. Actually it uses a linear directory structure for > >> small directories and b-trees for larger directories. This optimization > >> reminds me of the direct inode/indirect inode scheme used in FFS. > > > >All in all, for compatability, an NTFS would be a better choice, > >since FreeBSD is currently very Intel specific anyway. > > I think I'd rather we went with JFS rather than NTFS, just on general principle. :) Considering that on a PC I'm more likely to mount a NTFS partition than a JFS partition I'd rather see a FreeBSD NTFS -- and one that kicks NT's NTFS. Regards, Mike Hancock
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.SV4.3.93.961002133035.3204B-100000>