Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 13:32:55 -0400 From: Dan Langille <dan@langille.org> To: David Kelly <dkelly@hiwaay.net> Cc: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Inspired by "Two years ago today..." Message-ID: <84DD05D6-1D6C-49D6-B778-CC9CC2E14494@langille.org> In-Reply-To: <20081006163526.GA11984@Grumpy.DynDNS.org> References: <de2590e90810060752h41ed6462wc250732e1b9c767@mail.gmail.com> <20081006154552.GA64089@psconsult.nl> <20081006163526.GA11984@Grumpy.DynDNS.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Oct 6, 2008, at 12:35 PM, David Kelly wrote: > On Mon, Oct 06, 2008 at 05:45:52PM +0200, Paul Schenkeveld wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On Mon, Oct 06, 2008 at 11:52:17AM -0300, Alex Moura wrote: >>> I don't recommend to try this at home, but thinking about sharing a >>> curiousity... >>> >>> localhost:~$ uname -a && uptime >>> FreeBSD localhost 4.1-RELEASE FreeBSD 4.1-RELEASE #0: Wed Dec 13 >>> 16:19:46 BRST 2000 11:20AM up 2642 days, 2:16, 1 user, load >>> averages: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00 >> >> This must be fake, 2642 days ago it was Fri Jul 13, 2001 :-) > > Why must it be fake? jkh announced 4.1-RELEASE on Thu Jul 27 05:17:13 > PDT 2000, the above kernel was built in December 2000, and uptime > indicates it was last booted in July 2001. All quite reasonable. +1 I'd like to hear the explanation behind the claims of 'fake'. -- Dan Langille http://langille.org/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?84DD05D6-1D6C-49D6-B778-CC9CC2E14494>