Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2005 20:19:22 -0400 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>, ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Change to INDEX format Message-ID: <20051018001922.GA41333@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <20051018000833.GF71766@isis.sigpipe.cz> References: <20040619021700.GA27883@xor.obsecurity.org> <20040619111157.GA506@isis.wad.cz> <20051018000833.GF71766@isis.sigpipe.cz>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--Qxx1br4bt0+wmkIi Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Oct 18, 2005 at 02:08:33AM +0200, Roman Neuhauser wrote: > # neuhauser@chello.cz / 2004-06-19 13:11:57 +0200: > > # kris@obsecurity.org / 2004-06-18 19:17:00 -0700: > > > This patch extends the format of the INDEX file to separately list > > > FETCH_DEPENDS, EXTRACT_DEPENDS and PATCH_DEPENDS instead of lumping > > > them all together with BUILD_DEPENDS. > >=20 > > Do you think this needs to be reflected in the 'search' target in > > bsd.port.subdir.mk? >=20 > I'm updating Mk/bsd.port.subdir.mk to make searching and display > of the 11th to 13th field possible, and I have a question: what > should happen to the default display? Should the F-deps, E-deps, > P-deps fields be displayed by default? Probably, I guess. Kris --Qxx1br4bt0+wmkIi Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFDVD+JWry0BWjoQKURAlUYAKC6OjqtHy3eIKmVa6ekZC1CeT37YACg4cWg 2M4tgG2zoFEo3i7YdKlks68= =6h1k -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Qxx1br4bt0+wmkIi--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20051018001922.GA41333>