Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 5 Oct 2018 07:06:28 +1000
From:      Peter Jeremy <peter@rulingia.com>
To:        Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        freebsd-net@freebsd.org, freebsd-fcp@freebsd.org, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: FCP-0101: Deprecating most 10/100 Ethernet drivers
Message-ID:  <20181004210628.GC21091@server.rulingia.com>
In-Reply-To: <20181004084411.GA50348@FreeBSD.org>
References:  <20181003210516.GA71565@spindle.one-eyed-alien.net> <20181004084411.GA50348@FreeBSD.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--A6N2fC+uXW/VQSAv
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On 2018-Oct-04 08:44:11 +0000, Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org> wrote:
>Looking at the commits they require near zero maintenance.  What exactly
>is the burden here?

As various others have stated, this isn't true.  All the code in FreeBSD has
an ongoing maintenance cost and is an impediment to adding new features.
There is no point in spending valuable developer effort to update drivers
and test them with unusual/obsolete hardware unless those drivers are going
to actually be used.

>Another question: why the fuck FreeBSD likes to kill
>non-broken, low-volatile and perfectly working stuff?

That language is uncalled for.

>We offer probably
>the best NIC driver support on the block, yet you're proposing to shrink
>one of the few areas where we shine.  WTF?!

Supporting NICs that no-one uses doesn't benefit anyone.  No-one is talking
about removing NICs that are in active use.

>ae(4) was used in Asus EeePC 701/900 which are still popular among hackers.

Those netbooks are more than a decade old now and I don't expect many are
still functional.  Will people still expect to use them with FreeBSD 13 in 5
years time?

>As it can be seen this list tends to cover nearly all 100 cards, yet no
>one (pardon me if I missed those) asks for 10.  So how about making this
>proposal cover only 10 cards,

What is the purpose in keeping unused FastEthernet cards in the tree?

>if you can't resist the itch to remove
>something from the tree?

Again, that language is uncalled for.

--=20
Peter Jeremy

--A6N2fC+uXW/VQSAv
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=qZrA
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--A6N2fC+uXW/VQSAv--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20181004210628.GC21091>