Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2014 19:05:03 +0200 From: =?iso-8859-2?Q?Edward_Tomasz_Napiera=B3a?= <trasz@FreeBSD.org> To: Chris BeHanna <chris@behanna.org> Cc: FreeBSD FS <freebsd-fs@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: RFC: using ceph as a backend for an NFSv4.1 pNFS server Message-ID: <33C0F291-0DA4-4658-B249-0B0E1F633832@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <A833812C-A188-4023-B9AB-0A0F7FAD5C7F@behanna.org> References: <507714298.1684844.1398541651089.JavaMail.root@uoguelph.ca> <535E7D17.6000303@ster.kuleuven.be> <A833812C-A188-4023-B9AB-0A0F7FAD5C7F@behanna.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Wiadomość napisana przez Chris BeHanna w dniu 28 kwi 2014, o godz. 18:24: > On Apr 28, 2014, at 11:08 AM, Bram Vandoren <bram.vandoren@ster.kuleuven.be> wrote: > >> The amount of people waiting for yet another method to access their cluster file system is probably limited. > > LANL, LLNL, Sandia, every major oil & gas exploration company, large weather simulation centers, financial modelers, and let us not forget movie and TV CGI studios. > > Yup, pretty limited. :-) > > pNFS is pretty much *the* standard going forward for accessing large object-based (OSD) storage volumes. At least it was when I made a living in that space. Does that mean the OSD - as in, the SCSI standard - is finally starting to gain some traction?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?33C0F291-0DA4-4658-B249-0B0E1F633832>