Date: Sun, 21 May 2006 15:45:16 -0400 From: Mike Tancsa <mike@sentex.net> To: bv@wjv.com Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: improving transport over lossy links ? Message-ID: <6.2.3.4.0.20060521154316.11bd2598@64.7.153.2> In-Reply-To: <20060521154917.GB2053@wjv.com> References: <6.2.3.4.0.20060519110026.05820230@64.7.153.2> <Pine.BSF.3.96.1060520014045.15967A-100000@gaia.nimnet.asn.au> <6.2.3.4.0.20060519121104.1126b480@64.7.153.2> <20060521092602.GB20262@uk.tiscali.com> <6.2.3.4.0.20060521104147.081af2d8@64.7.153.2> <20060521154917.GB2053@wjv.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 11:49 AM 21/05/2006, Bill Vermillion wrote:
>And when performing fax from email - using sendmail incoming and
>routing to fax [in the early days of the current 'net before many
>people had 'net connections] the MT's were the only ones that
>worked with virtually ever target fax machine.
Thanks, I have used them in the past. They are certainly quite a bit
more expensive than the USRs (3x) but I might be able to justify it
if they really do perform a lot better.
---Mike
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?6.2.3.4.0.20060521154316.11bd2598>