Date: Sat, 18 Sep 1999 00:12:30 -0600 From: Warner Losh <imp@village.org> To: Wes Peters <wes@softweyr.com> Cc: Brett Glass <brett@lariat.org>, security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: BPF on in 3.3-RC GENERIC kernel Message-ID: <199909180612.AAA00597@harmony.village.org> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 17 Sep 1999 23:30:13 MDT." <37E32365.B9F9573B@softweyr.com> References: <37E32365.B9F9573B@softweyr.com> <4.2.0.58.19990917201820.046f09e0@localhost> <4.2.0.58.19990917160519.047cc890@localhost> <Your message of "Thu, 16 Sep 1999 18:54:24 MDT." <4.2.0.58.19990916185341.00aaf100@localhost> <4.2.0.58.19990916185341.00aaf100@localhost> <Pine.GSO.3.96.990916150427.5757E-100000@mission.mvnc.edu> <199909172208.QAA05554@harmony.village.org> <199909180244.UAA07013@harmony.village.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <37E32365.B9F9573B@softweyr.com> Wes Peters writes: : Worked for me. A well-written, accurate analogy too. I'll have to try again later... I'd be very interested in this. I personally think that schg is useful against accidental mistakes, but flawed in implementation. Although some of that may be due to inperfections in /etc/rc and friends. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199909180612.AAA00597>