Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2007 14:33:16 -0500 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: Francisco Reyes <lists@stringsutils.com> Cc: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org, Steven Hartland <killing@multiplay.co.uk>, Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Subject: Re: FreeBSD Scaling on 6.2-RELEASE? Message-ID: <20070225193316.GD77205@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <cone.1172420214.242114.68971.1000@zoraida.natserv.net> References: <0e2001c7574c$26bc15a0$b3db87d4@multiplay.co.uk> <cone.1172277148.840621.73625.5001@35st.simplicato.com> <20070224005748.GA25295@xor.obsecurity.org> <cone.1172420214.242114.68971.1000@zoraida.natserv.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --] On Sun, Feb 25, 2007 at 11:16:54AM -0500, Francisco Reyes wrote: > Kris Kennaway writes: > > >Actually it will help the DB side, when you have multiple simultaneous > >transactions - that's the point :) > > A little confused. > Does this mean FreeBSD will split the threads into multiple CPUs? Yes, if you're running a modern version of FreeBSD (not 4.x). > Or you meant the DB will do better because the load from other programs > will be split across the different CPUs? That will also happen. Kris [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFF4eR8Wry0BWjoQKURAuKwAKDNDcYcJkZrKx31DoTasWS4pvLCHACgqQwA jnJPXvNGxtLahwQoLsb+ddY= =XyeT -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20070225193316.GD77205>