Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2000 09:16:46 -0800 From: Marcel Moolenaar <marcel@cup.hp.com> To: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org> Cc: Peter Wemm <peter@netplex.com.au>, obrien@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: linprocfs placement... Message-ID: <3A350BFE.BBE81B05@cup.hp.com> References: <200012110932.eBB9WXK25578@mobile.wemm.org> <xzpelzfxnp9.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > > Peter Wemm <peter@netplex.com.au> writes: > > Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > > > No, because it would need to move again once it's no longer MD. If it > > > has to move, move it to sys/compat. > > Actually, sys/fs/ would be better.. > > sys/miscfs, in that case, which is where it started out. But I don't > agree, as linprocfs is for Linux compatibility only. But you said it doesn't depend on the Linuxulator. It can therefore be loaded by itself and used as an alternative for the FreeBSD procfs, right? -- Marcel Moolenaar mail: marcel@cup.hp.com / marcel@FreeBSD.org tel: (408) 447-4222 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3A350BFE.BBE81B05>