Date: Tue, 16 Jan 1996 22:16:23 +0100 (MET) From: J Wunsch <j@uriah.heep.sax.de> To: gjennejohn@frt.dec.com Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org (FreeBSD hackers) Subject: Re: kgdb.. Message-ID: <199601162116.WAA19391@uriah.heep.sax.de> In-Reply-To: <9601161808.AA23417@cssmuc.frt.dec.com> from "garyj@frt.dec.com" at Jan 16, 96 07:08:21 pm
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
As garyj@frt.dec.com wrote: > > I've wondered myself why it's still in the tree. Seems to me that > `gdb -k' works pretty well. Or does someone know of a reason NOT > to eliminate kgdb ? I'm using gdb -k all days. I've been one of those guys who have been in favour of the old kgdb... Well, i've just checked, Gary: kgdb is no longer in the regular tree: j@uriah 236% ls /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/ /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin: as/ CVS/ grep/ man/ sdiff/ awk/ dc/ groff/ mkisofs/ send-pr/ bc/ dialog/ gzip/ patch/ sort/ cc/ diff/ ld/ perl/ tar/ cpio/ diff3/ Makefile ptx/ texinfo/ cvs/ gdb/ Makefile.inc rcs/ yppush/ -- cheers, J"org joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de -- http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ -- NIC: JW11-RIPE Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199601162116.WAA19391>