Date: Tue, 10 Mar 1998 04:01:33 -0500 From: tcobb@staff.circle.net To: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: RE: UNION FS appropriate? Message-ID: <8188AD2EBC3CD111B7A30060082F32A40C3FA7@freya.circle.net>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tuesday, March 10, 1998 4:07 AM, Eivind Eklund wrote: > On Mon, Mar 09, 1998 at 11:30:51PM -0800, Julian Elischer wrote: > > You don't need chroot. > > I'm fairly certain Julian is trying to say 'union' here, just to clear > up any confusion. > Yup. For those watching from home, it appears that the solution to my dilemma may in fact be NULLFS. I've now done a test quick test on a dog of a machine (P75, 32MB) mounting 1000 NULLFS mounts with no discernable issues. The only problem I can find is that the NULLFS implementation doesn't respect rdonly mount options. I suspect that it uses the mount options of the underlying FS. Still exploring that part of it. - Troy To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?8188AD2EBC3CD111B7A30060082F32A40C3FA7>