Date: Thu, 2 Apr 1998 22:55:49 +0200 From: pb@fasterix.freenix.org (Pierre Beyssac) To: phk@critter.freebsd.dk (Poul-Henning Kamp) Cc: gljohns@bellsouth.net (Glenn Johnson), freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: error when compiling kernel with SOFTUPDATES Message-ID: <19980402225549.AY32283@@> In-Reply-To: <2061.891499248@critter.freebsd.dk>; from Poul-Henning Kamp on Apr 2, 1998 08:40:48 %2B0200 References: <199804020237.UAA00748@gforce.bellsouth.net> <2061.891499248@critter.freebsd.dk>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
Poul-Henning Kamp writes:
> change "tv = time" to "getmicrotime(&tv);"
Should getmicrotime() really be prefered in all cases ? From
kern_clock.c, it looks like microtime() has much less overhead when
you don't need a very accurate timestamp:
For each there is fast but less precise
version "get{nano|micro}time" which will return a time which is up
to 1/HZ previous to the call, whereas the raw version "{nano|micro}time"
will return a timestamp which is as precise as possible.
--
Pierre Beyssac pb@fasterix.frmug.org pb@fasterix.freenix.org
{Free,Net,Open}BSD, Linux : il y a moins bien, mais c'est plus cher
Free domains: http://www.eu.org/ or mail dns-manager@EU.org
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
help
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19980402225549.AY32283>