Date: Thu, 13 May 2021 09:32:35 -0700 From: Chris <portmaster@bsdforge.com> To: Christoph Moench-Tegeder <cmt@burggraben.net> Cc: freebsd-ports <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: pkg-fallout: License not correctly defined: defining both LICENSE_FILE and LICENSE_TEXT is not allowed Message-ID: <6a5d5af22c863c1b5284885d39bf1129@bsdforge.com> In-Reply-To: <YJ1PDacWsRFVHime@elch.exwg.net> References: <50a92b1644e8fa43f16d59aa013ca10d@bsdforge.com> <YJ1PDacWsRFVHime@elch.exwg.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2021-05-13 09:08, Christoph Moench-Tegeder wrote: > ## Chris (portmaster@bsdforge.com): > >> HOWEVER the error returned by pkg-fallout@ makes absolutely no >> sense at all, given the Makefile for the report contains only: > > Foremost, that Makefile has an .include, and that's where the mess > (for this use case) happens. > From a quick glance, I'm not totally sure how that > kde-icons-noia/Makefile.icons makes sense in the grand scheme of > things (if it's that common functionality, should it live somewhere > in Mk? if it's relevant only for a very limited number of ports, should > it have some comments about that?), but the way it currently interacts > with your port is not that fine: in the very least, it overwrites > your LICENSE variables, which cannot be your intention. (Try > "make -V LICENSE" in kde-icons-nuovoext2). Sorry. My bad. LGPL3 is now included in the current LICENSE Templates. So LICENSE_FILE is redundant && pkg-fallout (the ports framework) was trying to use a "clue bat" to tell me so. ;-) Sorry for the noise, and thanks for taking the time to reply. --Chris > > Regards, > Christoph
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?6a5d5af22c863c1b5284885d39bf1129>