Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 16 Jan 2014 13:21:10 -0800
From:      Peter Grehan <grehan@freebsd.org>
To:        Andrea Brancatelli <abrancatelli@schema31.it>
Cc:        "freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org" <freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: BHyVe as non root
Message-ID:  <52D84D46.9070600@freebsd.org>
In-Reply-To: <CADfWLek9E3J3ExBjHoyeguBXqsPFft8VB=cC8PuKG5KxOsAtMg@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <CADfWLek9E3J3ExBjHoyeguBXqsPFft8VB=cC8PuKG5KxOsAtMg@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi Andrea,
> do you see any particolar problem (devices who need to have the owner
> changed, limitations of any kind...?) in running BHyVe as non-root?

  There's 2 issues - firstly, bhyve is new and hasn't had a lot of 
exposure. It's probably safest to restrict it to root for a while to 
avoid exposing non-root users to unforeseen security issues.

  Secondly, the current implementation doesn't tie all resource usage to 
a process. The split of bhyveload/bhyve allows VM memory to be tied to a 
memory object associated with the VM. This complicates the tracking 
system memory usage, which is usually done on a process basis. The fix 
for this, in progress, is to use a single process for a VM, and avoid a 
separate loading process.

  The goal is to allow non-root usage, but there's still a ways to go 
for that.

later,

Peter.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?52D84D46.9070600>