Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2001 11:18:54 +0300 From: Peter Pentchev <roam@ringlet.net> To: itojun@iijlab.net Cc: Brian Somers <brian@Awfulhak.org>, snap-users@kame.net, Shunsuke SHINOMIYA <s-shino@kt.rim.or.jp>, freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, re@freebsd.org Subject: Re: (KAME-snap 5335) Re: user-ppp assigns the address same with already assigned for other clients Message-ID: <20010904111854.D61594@ringworld.oblivion.bg> In-Reply-To: <21631.999591047@itojun.org>; from itojun@iijlab.net on Tue, Sep 04, 2001 at 05:10:47PM %2B0900 References: <200109032011.f83KBRj24419@hak.lan.Awfulhak.org> <21631.999591047@itojun.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Sep 04, 2001 at 05:10:47PM +0900, itojun@iijlab.net wrote: > >I've cc'd snap-users@kame.net in case someone can come up with a > >quick fix (FreeBSD is about to be released, and this bug has just > >been exposed).... > > since KAME have never touched pppd for years, I don't think it > is related to kame. KAME has not touched pppd, but Brian mentions later on in his message that he thinks that the problem might be caused by the SIOCAIFADDR ioctl, which was currently implemented using the SIOCAIFADDR_IN6 ioctl during a KAME merge. G'luck, Peter -- .siht ekil ti gnidaer eb d'uoy ,werbeH ni erew ecnetnes siht fI To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010904111854.D61594>