Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2012 01:07:13 +0200 (CEST) From: Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> To: Thomas Schmitt <scdbackup@gmx.net> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: what's wrong with cd9660 fs Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1204220105510.6348@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> In-Reply-To: <99329673623314@192.168.2.69> References: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1204201700100.96314@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <99329673623314@192.168.2.69>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> I am currently trying to understand how fs/udf handles multiple extents. > /usr/src/sys/fs/udf/udf_vnops.c > bears in function udf_bmap_internal() a comment: > * If the offset is beyond the current extent, look for the > * next extent. > > > Have a nice day :) > > Thomas > > for now i add -udf when using mkisofs and mount_udf reads fine. anyway i would be happy to see fully working ISO filesystem, which is nearly optimal for read only usage. thank you very much
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.2.00.1204220105510.6348>