Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2003 12:00:16 +0400 From: Dmitry Agafonov <aga@rsm.ru> To: Mike Porter <mupi@mknet.org> Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: About mergemaster (Re: upgrading) Message-ID: <3F6FFD90.1060706@rsm.ru> In-Reply-To: <200309221814.26301.mupi@mknet.org> References: <12829.1064235540@thrush.ravenbrook.com> <3F6F0A0C.1060308@rsm.ru> <447k404pr5.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> <200309221814.26301.mupi@mknet.org>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
I think it is better to say "file rc.network is unchaged from default, but the new version is different (v)iew/(i)nstall/install (a)ll similar/(d)elete? [v]" or something... Mike Porter wrote: >I would strongly support a mechanism for asking for user input: "file >rc.network is unchaged from default, but the new version is different. >(v)iew/(c)ontinue? [v]" This would give the user the choice to be ignorant, >and sometimes, I would choose that, jsut becuase I want to get done >(especially if I am merging on the second or third machine, let alone 50 or >100)...also a scripting mechanism to automate installation on multiple >machines. > >home | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3F6FFD90.1060706>