Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 27 Jul 2024 22:24:46 +0800
From:      Zhenlei Huang <zlei@FreeBSD.org>
To:        void <void@f-m.fm>
Cc:        freebsd-current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: filemon
Message-ID:  <8E616DF1-8AA6-430D-8E99-E4D676CF0F17@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <ZqT6_a_0F8DCUsBm@int21h>
References:  <ZqT6_a_0F8DCUsBm@int21h>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help


> On Jul 27, 2024, at 9:49 PM, void <void@f-m.fm> wrote:
>=20
> Is it better to load filemon as kldload filemon, or to
> have it set as a device via 'device filemon' in the kernel config =
file? or to just load it when rebuilding the system?
>=20
> There is man 4 filemon but nothing there to describe usage as .ko
> or device. System is n271321-9ae91f59c500 on arm64.

Some module needs to be statically linked ( aka device FOO ) to serve =
its function.

Since filemon can be dynamically loaded I guess it ( dynamically loaded =
) has no differences on usage with statically linked one.

If it does have, then it should be warned in the man page.

>=20
> --=20
>=20






Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?8E616DF1-8AA6-430D-8E99-E4D676CF0F17>