Date: Sat, 23 Dec 2017 08:55:45 -0600 From: Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com> To: Jan Beich <jbeich@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Mark Linimon <linimon@FreeBSD.org>, ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r456719 - in head: biology/bedtools comms/gnuradio editors/libreoffice emulators/stella games/armagetron graphics/gsculpt net/linknx net/rsplib science/afni security/botan2 security/hig... Message-ID: <20171223145545.GA13962@lonesome.com> In-Reply-To: <8tdy-a671-wny@FreeBSD.org> References: <201712191441.vBJEfTLf054114@repo.freebsd.org> <8tdy-a671-wny@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I've put the individual ports on my to-do list, but some general comments: On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 08:06:10PM +0100, Jan Beich wrote: > Marking each port individually where commit message contains an excerpt > more than 1 line long would be more helpful. I'm sorry, but I don't have the cycles to spend 30min/port when I'm going through hundreds of failures in an attempt to bring an arch up to parity. > Why limit to Tier2 when Tier1 architectures are also affected? Affects > any FreeBSD release/architecture defaulting to libc++ 4.0 or later. As I've said before, this was my mistake in not double-checking to ensure the development portsmon instance was working right; I wasn't seeing the 11.x errors. I've fixed the bug there. > Probably was due to a bug in emulators/qemu-user-static. I'm trying to hold the machine I am running regression tests on to one version of installed ports and one version of source. There are too many moving parts otherwise. It's taken several months as it is. I believe we will need several more -trybroken runs in the future to catch all the stragglers. This is especially frustrating right now because I'm having to wait for llvm40, webkit2-gtk3, and ffmpeg each to run (serially) to analyze the complete results of the armv6 -trybroken I am currently running. I would like to get all the commits that will result from that in before the new year, but now I am beginning to doubt it. After the new year I intend to issue a more general call for help on the arm ports. Right now there is still no way to see the forest for the trees. All IMHO. mcl
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20171223145545.GA13962>