Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 15:39:20 +0100 From: Florent Thoumie <flz@FreeBSD.org> To: Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com> Cc: =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=F8rgrav?= <des@des.no>, cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/Mk bsd.port.mk Message-ID: <4651AF18.7020102@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20070521143509.GA12875@soaustin.net> References: <200705211021.l4LALdGa025468@repoman.freebsd.org> <86k5v2tnhv.fsf@dwp.des.no> <4651884F.3080207@FreeBSD.org> <867ir2tibr.fsf@dwp.des.no> <20070521143509.GA12875@soaustin.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --] Mark Linimon wrote: > On Mon, May 21, 2007 at 03:30:32PM +0200, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote: >> OK, I didn't realize we were going to remove XFree86 altogether > > Unless someone steps up to a) maintain it and b) make a case for its > remaining in the tree and c) regression-test the necessary infrastructure. > > e.g. "last call" has already been issued. I'm a bit reluctant to keep it. It adds unnecessary complexity to ports and the infrastructure itself. Obviously if there's a consensus against the removal, I won't do it. -- Florent Thoumie flz@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD Committer [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFGUa8YMxEkbVFH3PQRCjbuAKCJWAl2v4rwLNvCufUqhn3kjE2tHACghdxP 3dI8INoBXFhdDqAWBsqbfPc= =HkFk -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4651AF18.7020102>