Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2004 00:55:57 -0700 From: Doug Barton <DougB@DougBarton.net> To: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" <bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net> Cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/share/mk bsd.libnames.mk src/lib/bind config.mk src/lib/bind/dns Makefile src/lib/bind/isc Makefile src/l Message-ID: <4156760D.9010509@DougBarton.net> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.53.0409242207460.93902@e0-0.zab2.int.zabbadoz.net> References: <200409241342.i8ODg06a030839@repoman.freebsd.org> <Pine.BSF.4.53.0409242207460.93902@e0-0.zab2.int.zabbadoz.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote: > On Fri, 24 Sep 2004, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: >> What this really means is that all BIND libraries are now internal to >> buildworld (by default, unless WANT_BIND_LIBS is defined), and linked >> statically into various BIND executables. > > > these days that there is a dynalically linked base system why do it > the opposite way ? I am just curious ;-) The difference between what you describe and this situation is that the libraries that are linked in are not ever installed in /usr/lib. This is really no different than linking in any other static object when building a binary. HTH, Doug -- If you're never wrong, you're not trying hard enough
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4156760D.9010509>