Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 5 Jan 2011 09:28:30 -0500
From:      John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org>
To:        Dimitry Andric <dim@freebsd.org>
Cc:        svn-src-head@freebsd.org, Alexander Best <arundel@freebsd.org>, Gleb Kurtsou <gleb.kurtsou@gmail.com>, src-committers@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: svn commit: r216977 - in head/libexec/rtld-elf: amd64 i386
Message-ID:  <201101050928.30748.jhb@freebsd.org>
In-Reply-To: <4D2473C6.40102@FreeBSD.org>
References:  <201101042051.p04KpSGk054564@svn.freebsd.org> <201101050759.50877.jhb@freebsd.org> <4D2473C6.40102@FreeBSD.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wednesday, January 05, 2011 8:36:06 am Dimitry Andric wrote:
> On 2011-01-05 13:59, John Baldwin wrote:
> >> Why not to add NO_HWFLOAT knob (or similar) into makefile
> >> infrastructure. And set CFLAGS accordingly, depending on CC, arch, etc.
> >> These flags are getting rather common in tree.
> >
> > It strikes me that we really want clang/gcc to have some sort of
> > '-mno-hwfloat' so we don't keep having to add new flags in the future.
> 
> This is not just about floats, clang can also use SSE/AVX instructions
> for e.g.  memset(), memcpy() and the like, or even for structure
> assignments.

Yes, but the thing that all these extensions have in common is that they use
FPU state (i.e. subject to DNA traps, managed via *SAVE and *RSTOR, etc.)
and that is the problem with using them in boot code or rtld.  What I would
want a -mno-hwfloat flag to do is to disable use of anything that would
require working FPU state handling.

-- 
John Baldwin



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201101050928.30748.jhb>