Date: Mon, 09 Apr 2007 10:06:09 +0200 From: Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@Leidinger.net> To: Rink Springer <rink@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: linux_statfs64() missing an argument?? Message-ID: <20070409100609.x7is0pofwcoo84gw@webmail.leidinger.net> In-Reply-To: <20070408194326.GA77190@rink.nu> References: <20070408191012.GA95373@outcold.yadt.co.uk> <20070408194326.GA77190@rink.nu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Quoting Rink Springer <rink@freebsd.org> (from Sun, 8 Apr 2007 =20 21:43:26 +0200): > Hi David, > > On Sun, Apr 08, 2007 at 08:10:13PM +0100, David Taylor wrote: >> I'm currently recompiling my kernel to test this, but thought I'd see >> if anyone had any comments on the patch as is, since I've probably done >> something wrong, as I'm not too sure how the whole syscalls.master setup >> works. > > Looks good to me. However, as you might have seen, some files are > flagged "Do not edit". I believe editing a syscalls.master file will > automatically invoke a rebuild of these files, and thus, they need not > be part of your patch. After editing szscalls.master zou have to run "make sysent", this will =20 generate the other files. You don't have to add the generates files in =20 the patch. Please change syscalls.master on i386 and on amd64... I haven't looked at the patch (EBUSY). If it works for you please send a PR in case nobody agrees to commit =20 it. This way it isn't lost and freebsd-emulation will get a reminding =20 mail about it from time to time. Bye, Alexander. --=20 So so is good, very good, very excellent good: and yet it is not; it is but so so. =09=09-- William Shakespeare, "As You Like It" http://www.Leidinger.net Alexander @ Leidinger.net: PGP ID =3D B0063FE7 http://www.FreeBSD.org netchild @ FreeBSD.org : PGP ID =3D 72077137
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20070409100609.x7is0pofwcoo84gw>