Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2016 00:44:31 +0300 From: Slawa Olhovchenkov <slw@zxy.spb.ru> To: Lowell Gilbert <freebsd-stable-local@be-well.ilk.org> Cc: Dag-Erling =?utf-8?B?U23DuHJncmF2?= <des@des.no>, stable@freebsd.org, krad <kraduk@gmail.com> Subject: Re: unbound and ntp issuse Message-ID: <20160610214431.GA2894@zxy.spb.ru> In-Reply-To: <44vb1gx3l9.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> References: <20160608094859.GH75625@zxy.spb.ru> <CALfReyes2H4e86B8gUfPEui8ivqWuaMDzcMa_=4BQorvvTam9A@mail.gmail.com> <20160609080440.GR75630@zxy.spb.ru> <CALfReycwtf9eiVDRLpqW==fYNWfaoeERfh8tFg=LKaiXWGC3ig@mail.gmail.com> <20160609133739.GV75630@zxy.spb.ru> <44r3c68od2.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> <20160609140209.GW75630@zxy.spb.ru> <44mvmu8b9m.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> <20160609185645.GZ75630@zxy.spb.ru> <44vb1gx3l9.fsf@be-well.ilk.org>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 03:10:10PM -0400, Lowell Gilbert wrote:
> Slawa Olhovchenkov <slw@zxy.spb.ru> writes:
>
> > On Thu, Jun 09, 2016 at 02:31:17PM -0400, Lowell Gilbert wrote:
> >
> >> Slawa Olhovchenkov <slw@zxy.spb.ru> writes:
> >>
> >> > On Thu, Jun 09, 2016 at 09:48:25AM -0400, Lowell Gilbert wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> Slawa Olhovchenkov <slw@zxy.spb.ru> writes:
> >> >>
> >> >> > On Thu, Jun 09, 2016 at 02:29:09PM +0100, krad wrote:
> >> >> >
> >> >> >> I doubt that will happen as you are asking to pollute every release
> >> >> >> installation for an edge condition when there is numerous work arounds
> >> >> >> that would be acceptable to most. eg two lines in rc.conf will fix the
> >> >> >> issue.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > This manual editing will be required by every install on RPi, for
> >> >> > example.
> >> >>
> >> >> No, it won't. Most people will just give the system a valid DNS
> >> >> configuration, and the clock will not be an issue.
> >> >
> >> > What invalid in my DNS configuration?
> >>
> >> You said that you configured 127.0.0.1 as your DNS server. You didn't
> >> say how (or rather where) you did that, but if you had used the address
> >> of a working upstream recursive server, I suspect there wouldn't have
> >> been any problem.
> >
> > Configuring 127.0.0.1 as DNS server and enabling loacal_unbound cause
> > unbound acts as recursive resolver. This is conventional setup.
> > ("No forwarders found in resolv.conf, unbound will recurse."
> > -- from /usr/sbin/local-unbound-setup)
>
> I'll check on it if I get a chance.
>
> > Using upstream recursive server with local unbound will cause same
> > problem, IMHO, because unbound will be enfocing DNSSEC by the same
> > way and rejecting all answers from upstream.
>
> Well, we know that is not the case, because in that case nearly everyone
> would be having the problem.
Only in case of very incorrect time at startup (2008 year in may case,
after CMOS reset)
home |
help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20160610214431.GA2894>