Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 1 Sep 2002 22:36:09 +0000 (GMT)
From:      Kris Kirby <kris@catonic.net>
To:        Giorgos Keramidas <keramida@ceid.upatras.gr>
Cc:        Peter Leftwich <Hostmaster@Video2Video.Com>, FreeBSD LIST <FreeBSD-Questions@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: 0.9 % frag
Message-ID:  <Pine.BSF.4.44.0209012228300.48765-100000@spaz.catonic.net>
In-Reply-To: <20020902002730.P27353-100000@hades>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 2 Sep 2002, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
> > Should I be concerned about 0.9% fragmentation?  Can fsck make it lower?

> Short answer: no, and no.
>
> For a longer answer, you have to understand a bit the way FreeBSD
> splits the disk in blocks and 'fragments', and the way those are
> allocated to data.  This is not the same "fragmentation" you might
> have heard of when learning about tools like DOS's defrag utility.

<salesman>
YES, THAT'S RIGHT! For the first time in your life YOU CAN FORGET ABOUT
DISK FRAGMENTATION.
</salesman>

--
Kris Kirby, KE4AHR  <kris@nospam.catonic.net>  TGIFreeBSD IM: 'KrisBSD'
                    "BIG BROTHER IS WATCHING YOU!"
 This message brought to you by the US Department of Homeland Security


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.44.0209012228300.48765-100000>