Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2014 15:51:32 -0700 (MST) From: Warren Block <wblock@wonkity.com> To: Ian Smith <smithi@nimnet.asn.au> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org>, Walter Hop <freebsd@spam.lifeforms.nl> Subject: Re: Small motd nit in 10.1 Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.11.1411051546530.70051@wonkity.com> In-Reply-To: <20141103181034.K52402@sola.nimnet.asn.au> References: <8C81A636-D2B5-4EFB-9EA3-58E88E16CA94@spam.lifeforms.nl> <alpine.BSF.2.11.1410291809280.16887@wonkity.com> <93E9657A-737E-4705-A0E5-01F9E9110261@gromit.dlib.vt.edu> <201410301554.03504.jhb@freebsd.org> <alpine.BSF.2.11.1410301400480.49641@wonkity.com> <alpine.BSF.2.11.1410301826120.58201@wonkity.com> <alpine.BSF.2.11.1411021222490.72315@wonkity.com> <20141103181034.K52402@sola.nimnet.asn.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 3 Nov 2014, Ian Smith wrote: > On Sun, 2 Nov 2014 12:23:31 -0700, Warren Block wrote: > > On Thu, 30 Oct 2014, Warren Block wrote: > > > > > On Thu, 30 Oct 2014, Warren Block wrote: > > > > > > > There is room on that line to show both: > > > > > > > > Show details of the FreeBSD installation: uname -a ; freebsd-version > > > > > > > > Or some combination like that. > > > > > > Actually, I think the output from 'freebsd-version ; uname -a' is less > > > ambiguous. > > > > Since nobody has complained about this, I'll update head now and plan to MFC > > it. Hopefully it will be in time for 10.1-RELEASE. > > It should be obvious, I guess, that this doesn't apply to 9.x (tested :) Right. MFCed from head to 10-stable, and good news: squeaking into releng/10.1 just under the wire, thanks to Glen Barber.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.2.11.1411051546530.70051>