Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2012 10:41:21 -0800 From: perryh@pluto.rain.com To: linimon@lonesome.com Cc: ports@freebsd.org, emulation@freebsd.org, jgh@freebsd.org, utisoft@gmail.com Subject: Re: MASTER_SITE_FEDORA_LINUX in bsd.sites.mk Message-ID: <4f1863d1.Fic%2Bp76hZFab0jQU%perryh@pluto.rain.com> In-Reply-To: <20120118222747.GA372@lonesome.com> References: <20120116201117.GA90568@dormouse.experts-exchange.com> <4f15924a.7CUoXdl4yduNUIqM%perryh@pluto.rain.com> <CADLo838XMx3jeJFxMP5Ej007Vmi0bX2i%2BhhGv7zzjObfn-08LQ@mail.gmail.com> <20120118222747.GA372@lonesome.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com> wrote: > On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 09:09:10PM +0000, Chris Rees wrote: > > I worry about the ethics of 'stealing' Fedora's bandwidth with > > other people's ports; we should only be using their mirrors if > > it's explicitly developed by Fedora. > > Correct. dougb has pointed this out before and no one has taken > the cycles to go act on it. Consider this a task that needs > volunteers. > > (A similiar caveat applies to the Debian and NetBSD sites; > I believe it was Debian he flagged previously.) Isn't this concern orthogonal to the original one about maintaining a (set of) correct MASTER_SITE setting(s), for use by such ports as can legitimately use Fedora/Debian/NetBSD/whatever sites?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4f1863d1.Fic%2Bp76hZFab0jQU%perryh>