Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 10 Dec 1996 13:20:28 -0500 (EST)
From:      "John S. Dyson" <toor@dyson.iquest.net>
To:        lindgren@istudio.no (Simon Lindgren)
Cc:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: FreeBSD on a PPRO
Message-ID:  <199612101820.NAA00352@dyson.iquest.net>
In-Reply-To: <3.0.32.19961210182048.00ba6680@istudio.no> from "Simon Lindgren" at Dec 10, 96 06:20:49 pm

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>
> Does FreeBSD (2.1.6R) take full potential of a Pentium PRO?
>
Not quite.  It isn't terrible though.

>
> Will there be a significant speed-increase when upgrading from a
> regular pentium of same speeds?
> 
Yes.  The PPro is mostly nicer than the P5 on FreeBSD.  However,
there are still some PCI bus problems on the PPro (actually the
Natoma/Orion chipsets.)  I think that if you are "pushing" the PCI
bus, the Triton-II on a P5 will do you better.  Compile times, etc.
are better on a P6, and SMP will work much better.

>
> Some insight would be appreciated.
> 
The 2.1.X series hasn't had serious VM work done on in in about 1-2yrs.  It
performs okay, but is about 1 generation behind.  The 2.2 series is much
better and has some improvements for PPros.  (Global TLB bits, use of
bswap, etc...)  2.2 will also work better on large systems.

John




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199612101820.NAA00352>