Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2015 14:00:52 -0400 (EDT) From: Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@MIT.EDU> To: Franco Fichtner <franco@lastsummer.de> Cc: Kimmo Paasiala <kpaasial@gmail.com>, freebsd-security <freebsd-security@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: scope of private libraries Message-ID: <alpine.GSO.1.10.1506011359040.22210@multics.mit.edu> In-Reply-To: <2C5684F6-5D01-42BE-A7BD-13DD88040128@lastsummer.de> References: <201506010138.t511cp2P088983@gw.catspoiler.org> <alpine.GSO.1.10.1506011214350.22210@multics.mit.edu> <CA%2B7WWSc47cH_C%2BJCFNv22onuf-V=mFNQ%2BU96Gx_vUm-1YU2OdQ@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.GSO.1.10.1506011238440.22210@multics.mit.edu> <2C5684F6-5D01-42BE-A7BD-13DD88040128@lastsummer.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 1 Jun 2015, Franco Fichtner wrote:
> As a side note, does pkgng really have to depend on base
> OpenSSL; does it have to depend on a full-blown SSL library?
Yes.
-Ben
(From IRC:)
efnet / #bsddev / bjk 13:17 ()
In particular, Franco asked "does pkg really need to depend on openssl from
base?"
efnet / #bsddev / bjk 13:17 ()
To which I believe the answer is "yes", but am not authoritative
efnet / #bsddev / bapt 13:48 (bapt!~bapt@ns3301091.ip-178-32-217.eu)
bjk: I'm not reading but the answer is yes
efnet / #bsddev / bapt 13:48 (bapt!~bapt@ns3301091.ip-178-32-217.eu)
pkg needs openssl
efnet / #bsddev / bapt 13:48 (bapt!~bapt@ns3301091.ip-178-32-217.eu)
because of rsa keys
efnet / #bsddev / bapt 13:48 (bapt!~bapt@ns3301091.ip-178-32-217.eu)
because of sha256 as well
efnet / #bsddev / bapt 13:48 (bapt!~bapt@ns3301091.ip-178-32-217.eu)
well this one could be replaced by libmd but it is way slower
efnet / #bsddev / bapt 13:49 (bapt!~bapt@ns3301091.ip-178-32-217.eu)
also without openssl no https support
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.GSO.1.10.1506011359040.22210>