Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2003 04:03:44 -0500 (EST) From: Charles Sprickman <spork@inch.com> To: Doug Barton <DougB@freebsd.org> Cc: Jonathan Lemon <jlemon@flugsvamp.com>, "" <stable@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: LAST_ACK timeout Message-ID: <20030226040045.O98344@shell.inch.com> In-Reply-To: <20030226004737.N903@znfgre.tberna.bet> References: <200302250317.h1P3HTtJ056208@mail.flugsvamp.com> <20030226033845.V98344@shell.inch.com> <20030226004737.N903@znfgre.tberna.bet>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 26 Feb 2003, Doug Barton wrote: > I agree on the need for LB's to do things right, but they aren't just for > helping MS software. :) I understand, but I would bet there's been at least a quadrupling of machines backing hotmail/msn since they moved to windows... :) > I'm curious about whether keepalives help this situation. What does > net.inet.tcp.always_keepalive say? It's on now, and was previously: net.inet.tcp.always_keepalive: 1 The tunables related to it are defaults: net.inet.tcp.keepidle: 7200000 net.inet.tcp.keepintvl: 75000 Thanks, Charles > Doug > > -- > > "The last time France wanted more evidence, it rolled right > through Paris with a German flag." - David Letterman > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030226040045.O98344>