Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2019 13:50:15 +0000 From: Dave B <g8kbvdave@googlemail.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: freebsd-questions Digest, Vol 804, Issue 5 Message-ID: <6a3990c6-9f2e-81b5-c0fe-7315fc831dfb@googlemail.com> In-Reply-To: <mailman.86.1573041604.97553.freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> References: <mailman.86.1573041604.97553.freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
If you search around, Win7 is far from comatose (let alone dead!) Within "Industry" (where stuff actually happens) Win7 is very much alive and kicking. (Along with quite a bit of XP-embedded too!) The MS mantra of "contact your software vendor for updated versions compatible with Windows 10" is a pile of Bull*, when the company that made the product has gone, or been absorbed into another entity, who will not provide any such "upgrades", even if they have the ability.. I'm not sure, but I think to a certain extent, a lot of XP Embedded systems may still be in support for security updates (if anyone bothered or dared to connect them to the web) If not, then Embedded versions of WIn7 will certainly have an extended support time too. Though personally I migrated away from Windows to Linux (I found BSD too clunky to use and CPU hungry for desktop use, where it could be installed. Where as modern Linux's, just load and run with minimal effort, and are well understood, supported and stable.) That was after the great W10 force-feeding saga, where they filled my C drive to the point that the system would not even boot. DESPITE, their own compatibility trial saying that my combo' of CPU and GPU were not compatible with W10!. (AMD and ATI-Rage+) I still have to use Windows (7 & XP) at work, but there is a move towards 10, just for corporate satisfaction, and that our IT people are of course looking to push it to us (for a fee of course, new hardware needed, they say.) Problem for many who do "engineering" stuff, is Win10's propensity to want to phone home all the time, plus updates wreck connectivity to some specialist (and not so special) I/O devices, needing a lot of time (and therefore) money to resolve. And as for the privacy issues... Just so it is said, *BSD is great for servers, I have two NAS systems based on BSD under my wing, utterly solid and reliable too. (Far more so, than the MS based servers in the same rack!) But I have to say, that for most people BSD is not an option for a desktop "daily driver", except perhaps in the form of an Apple MAC! But how much time and money did Apple invest in getting it that way? Cheers All. Dave B. On 06/11/2019 12:00, freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org wrote: > "exfat" is certainly a good choice; however, I would not rule out NTFS > completely. Windows 7, while not EOL until 2020, is definitely > comatose. I don't don't know anyone still using it, especially since > Microsoft offered an easy and free upgrade path. -- Created on and sent from a Unix like PC running and using free and open source software:
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?6a3990c6-9f2e-81b5-c0fe-7315fc831dfb>