Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2020 13:34:53 -0400 From: Ed Maste <emaste@freebsd.org> To: Ian Lepore <ian@freebsd.org> Cc: FreeBSD Current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Any a.out users? Message-ID: <CAPyFy2AWge6G2DNXJ%2BTwM-aV_j4FF-2oT7XtF42SCMoKAqt9yg@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <177f99391d35483369bd43a2be1e994d07697e17.camel@freebsd.org> References: <CAPyFy2CmZO_eDFTMhk0TO8QbN9H%2BnE5KVk058MyjhqtNcPy-RA@mail.gmail.com> <177f99391d35483369bd43a2be1e994d07697e17.camel@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 13 Mar 2020 at 13:22, Ian Lepore <ian@freebsd.org> wrote: > > Could a.out support be a kernel config option that's off by default? Probably. That seems reasonable to me. > And could its presence be indicated via sysctl in some way, so that > ldconfig could do a.out hints only if support for them is available? But why does ldconfig need to know about a.out files at all? Assuming this support still works we can just provide an a.out ldconfig along with a.out shared libraries.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAPyFy2AWge6G2DNXJ%2BTwM-aV_j4FF-2oT7XtF42SCMoKAqt9yg>