Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2016 15:13:36 +0300 From: Slawa Olhovchenkov <slw@zxy.spb.ru> To: Konstantin Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Enabling NUMA in BIOS stop booting FreeBSD Message-ID: <20161214121336.GD98176@zxy.spb.ru> In-Reply-To: <20161214113927.GG94325@kib.kiev.ua> References: <20161213141114.GJ90287@zxy.spb.ru> <20161213143401.GK90287@zxy.spb.ru> <20161213150139.GZ54029@kib.kiev.ua> <20161213152838.GL90287@zxy.spb.ru> <20161213172529.GC54029@kib.kiev.ua> <20161213174345.GB98176@zxy.spb.ru> <20161214095350.GE94325@kib.kiev.ua> <20161214102711.GF94325@kib.kiev.ua> <20161214105211.GC98176@zxy.spb.ru> <20161214113927.GG94325@kib.kiev.ua>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 01:39:27PM +0200, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > In other words, it is almost certainly the hang and not a fault causing > hang. This means that the machine is not compliant with the IA32 > architecture, in particular, the region reported as normal memory by > E820 BIOS service does not behave as normal memory. > > Since regardless of the option setting, the memory map is same, and > bootstrap page table only depend on the memory map, we use the same page > table when hanging and when operating correctly. We do not fault or hang > when the option is turned off, which together with the improved early > fault handling in the patch, makes it almost certain that the problem is > in hardware configuration and not in our early setup. > > Of course, the most puzzling part is that memory test makes the hang > go away, while repeating memory test operation only on the msgbuf region > does not. msgbuf is special in that it is located at TOHM (top of high > memory). It spans 128KB from below it to the last byte of the last > physical segment. > > The only ideas I have right now is that there is either a bug in the > Caching Agent/Home agent/IMC configuration in BIOS, in which case there > is nothing OS can do to mitigate it. Or it might be that the memory > map reported by CMS is wrong (you said that you use legacy boot, right > ?). This is not too surprising if true, because non-EFI boot code path > definitely get less and less testing. > > For the later case (potential bug in CMS), could you switch to EFI boot > mode and see whether the issue magically healths itself ? You could boot > from USB stick in EFI mode without reinstalling for test. I can't boot from USB stick -- this is remote DC and IPMI allow only CDROM emulation. OK, I am boot in UEFI 12.0 snapshot ISO. Boot ok. Can I convert installed OS to UEFI mode? > Do you use latest BIOS for your motherboard ? This is new MB (X10DRi) w/ BIOS 2.0, new is 2.1 but update is not simple (need to prepare bootable dos ISO, mostly utilites don't work under FreeBSD).home | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20161214121336.GD98176>
