Date: Wed, 02 Aug 2000 00:12:54 +0200 From: "Andrei A. Dergatchev" <A.Dergatchev@tn.utwente.nl> To: freebsd-newbies@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: new books, changing my pt. of view Message-ID: <39874B66.446DEF7C@tn.utwente.nl> References: <000b01bff0cb$f90fe8e0$57e17ad1@beefstew> <39749BDA.8E6A214B@acuson.com> <00a101bffbf9$f88f42b0$847e03cb@ROADRUNNER> <000a01bffbfb$b1fc2c80$1adf7ad1@beefstew> <00bd01bffc04$20562b10$847e03cb@ROADRUNNER>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> SCO docs are certainly the best I've come across ..... I wonder have you seen Solaris docs ? just wondering. their dead paper is somewhat pricy, but when you pay, you get ... let see ... around 50 manuals - everything is explained in details. And one can get all that free online on their docs site - good one imho. and Solaris isn't the best OS for all purposes either ... as for open software - one can't expect a $.01 writting it, so how os-professionals earning $$$/h will bother ? > unlike > open source stuff ALL the info you need is readily available > in one place .... dunno if SCO is as stable as FreeBSD but > at least the issue of installation / configuration of something > different isn't the command performance it typically is with > FreeBSD. The OZ distributors run "Quarterly Business Briefings" > and usually have plenty of free copies of the manual / media packs > etc to give away so one doesn't need to spend the $120 odd that > bookshops ask for the thing. > > I'm really impressed with the reliability of FreeBSD, however the > difficulty experienced in getting unfamiliar stuff working due to the > dreadfully inadequate explanations provided in available docs is > frustrating me to the point where I'm seriously considering a move > to SCO. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-newbies" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?39874B66.446DEF7C>