Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 17 Nov 2011 08:39:41 -0500 (EST)
From:      Wietse Venema <wietse@porcupine.org>
To:        Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        Kurt Jaeger <lists@opsec.eu>, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, Wietse Venema <wietse@porcupine.org>
Subject:   Re: "postfix-current" broken on amd64 platform
Message-ID:  <3Skk8Y0rVxzk2RT@spike.porcupine.org>
In-Reply-To: <4EC48951.2070908@FreeBSD.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Doug Barton:
> On 11/16/2011 05:03, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > I tend to believe that network-less build environments are not
> > representative for the environment where an Internet MTA would run,
> > but hey, what do I know.
> 
> I think you're right that having a network makes the MTA more useful. :)
>  However given the prevalence and popularity of pre-packaged software in
> the Unix world it's probably worth thinking about what parts of the
> build/configuration process need to be done at build time, and what
> parts should be done at run time.
> 
> Not only do I work on the FreeBSD project generally, I also maintain a
> package building system that we use at $JOB to install packages on the
> various remote hosts. Having those packages do the right thing even if
> the package builder and the remote systems don't have identical
> configurations is a huge advantage.

Yup, hence my request for the immensely helpful information about
your build environment. Obviously, yours differs from mine; addressing
this in a responsible manner requires that I can reproduce conditions
that are currently unspecified ("no network" is too vague).

	Wietse



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3Skk8Y0rVxzk2RT>