Date: Sun, 02 Jul 2000 10:44:22 -0700 (PDT) From: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.ORG> To: wilko@FreeBSD.ORG Cc: obrien@FreeBSD.ORG, Will Andrews <andrews@technologist.com>, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG, "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@zippy.osd.bsdi.com> Subject: Re: /sys hierarchy Message-ID: <200007021744.KAA34748@john.baldwin.cx> In-Reply-To: <20000702114353.C19714@freebie.wbnet>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 02-Jul-00 Wilko Bulte wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 02, 2000 at 12:36:59AM -0700, John Baldwin wrote:
>
>> Ok (/me dons the asbestos suit, climbs into the concrete room and locks
>> the door.) Here is my proposal. It attempts to follow these loose guidelines:
>
>> compile/ - no change
>
> I'd change this into compile/${MACHINE_ARCH} so that a single shared source
> tree can be used to build [alpha,i386] kernels. In the current setup one
> gets clashes with GENERIC etc.
Sounds good to me actually. Although, should it be ${MACHINE_ARCH}/compile
instead in keeping with the mentioned goal of keeping all MD stuff under
${MACHINE_ARCH}?
--
John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> -- http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/
PGP Key: http://www.cslab.vt.edu/~jobaldwi/pgpkey.asc
"Power Users Use the Power to Serve!" - http://www.FreeBSD.org/
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200007021744.KAA34748>