Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 22 Feb 2020 22:57:59 -0500
From:      Pedro Giffuni <pfg@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Florian Smeets <flo@smeets.xyz>, src-committers@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, svn-src-head@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: svn commit: r358153 - head/usr.sbin/services_mkdb
Message-ID:  <c982d42c-e6dd-1b20-44ca-87c8d3e4f802@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <20200223010937.fTLhW%steffen@sdaoden.eu>
References:  <202002200354.01K3s8ib077553@repo.freebsd.org> <03606e17-08fc-f575-95f5-c3c5128bff4f@smeets.xyz> <ed430f6a-e612-5fdb-2d70-058da5c04b09@FreeBSD.org> <20200223010937.fTLhW%steffen@sdaoden.eu>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

On 22/02/2020 20:09, Steffen Nurpmeso wrote:
> Hey, just so, because i posted to such a thing the last time.
>
> Pedro Giffuni wrote in
> <ed430f6a-e612-5fdb-2d70-058da5c04b09@FreeBSD.org>:
>   |On 22/02/2020 11:18, Florian Smeets wrote:
>   |> On 20.02.20 04:54, Pedro F. Giffuni wrote:
>   |>> Author: pfg
>   |>> Date: Thu Feb 20 03:54:07 2020
>   |>> New Revision: 358153
>   |>> URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/358153
>   |>>
>   |>> Log:
>   |>>    /etc/services: attempt bring the database to this century.
>   |>>
>   |>> -smtps             465/tcp    #smtp protocol over TLS/SSL (was ssmtp)
>   |>> -smtps             465/udp    #smtp protocol over TLS/SSL (was ssmtp)
>   |> I'm not sure how removals of services have been handled in the past.
>   |> This change broke loading of my pf rule set, as I had smtps in there.
>   |
>   |Excellent!
>   |
>   |Not that the change broke something but that since we had to revert it
>   |we get a second chance to review such things.
>   |
>   |> I'm not saying that this change is wrong, but I think removing entries
>   |> from services can break all kinds of stuff. Not just firewall rule sets,
>   |> also scripts and thinking more about it, it will most certainly also
>   |> break postfix as it also uses smtps as an alias for port 465 in its
>   |> master.cnf
>   |
>   |According to latest IANA registy:
>   ...
>
>    kpasswd           464/udp   # kpasswd (Theodore Ts o)
>    urd               465/tcp   # URL Rendezvous Directory for SSM (Toerless Eckert)
>    submissions       465/tcp   # Message Submission over TLS protocol (IESG, IETF Chair, rfc8314) [2017-12-12]
>    igmpv3lite        465/udp   # IGMP over UDP for SSM (Toerless Eckert)
>    digital-vrc       466/tcp   # digital-vrc (Peter Higginson)
>
> Oh yes, they finally managed to overcome the SMTPS problems.
> The RFC has a nice reading on that (as i seem to remember), yay IETF.
> I am really happy.  (I never understood why POP3S and IMAPS where
> done but SMTPS was not.)
Hmm .. I quoted the IANA list but I hadn't read the RFC. Interesting but 
I don't know if it solves Florian's issue.
>   |Anything that can be done upstream to sort this out?
>   |
>   |> I guess this needs to be at least mentioned in the release notes, and
>   |> maybe smtps kept as an alias, and check all the others that were removed?
>   |
>   |For the time being, we can absolutely keep the legacy value with a
>   |conflict note. I wish the services list were a bit easier to maintain
>   |for such situations.
>
> Doesn't it just search until it finds the string?
> Btw. i can only offer the simple awk script that i have for
> updating services and protocols again, after the critics last time
> i have evolved it from its ArchLinux base, and added a verbose
> mode, as you can see above.  (That Theodore Ts'o missspelling is
> IANA rooted.)  Whereas it made it more complicated, 139 lines for
> download and preparation is not that much.

Interesting. There's also

https://reviews.freebsd.org/D17115

Where I made some comments.

Currently services_mkdb doesn't scale (which is why the patch was 
reverted), but beyond that the real problem is that we shouldn't just 
take the entries blindly. Many people abuse the registry for their 
startups and licensing services and then never de-register them.  In the 
case of NetBSD's services file, it currently has 21838 lines, which is 
bigger that the official IANA file.

> Additions could simply be echoed?

I expect we maintain a relatively short list and have people send PRs 
for new entries (assuming they are registered).

BTW, we should probably go ahead and register our lockd in IANA as the 
port number already collides with something else and our use is 
propagating to other OSs (namely illumos).

Pedro.

> --steffen
> |
> |Der Kragenbaer,                The moon bear,
> |der holt sich munter           he cheerfully and one by one
> |einen nach dem anderen runter  wa.ks himself off
> |(By Robert Gernhardt)



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?c982d42c-e6dd-1b20-44ca-87c8d3e4f802>