Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2006 04:51:08 -0800 From: <soralx@cydem.org> To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Venting my frustration with FreeBSD Message-ID: <20061205045108.6b3d8633@freen0de> In-Reply-To: <200612041443.15154.josh@tcbug.org> References: <200612041443.15154.josh@tcbug.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 4 Dec 2006 14:43:15 -0600 Josh Paetzel <josh@tcbug.org> wrote: > days I'm not so sure. Is FBSD targetted at network servers, at > desktops, at embedded devices? don't know about the official target, but it does make a good workstation (or used to, before came pthreads and gnome, and maybe KDE: now tracking down crashes, bugs, compile errors, sudden breakage of things, never ending instability -- all this wastes huge amounts of time. Huge.) > What architectures do we target? > Looking at the website I see alpha, amd64, ARM, i386, ia64, MIPS, > pc98, ppc, sparc64, sun4v, and xbox. I know this is a volunteer > project, I know you really can't keep people from tinkering with what > they want to tinker with, but xbox? It seems to me to be a waste of > resources to concentrate on anything besides i386/AMD64..... perfectly normal and acceptable (and, IMHO, welcome) directions. Just like you, everyone (I suppose) wants to be able to run their favourite OS on the available hardware (every hw has its pros&cons, too) > surprised if sparc went away) ARM isn't going away, but is FreeBSD > really concerned with the embedded market? of course! (e.g., m0n0wall) can you suggest a better OS for this purpose? -- [SorAlx] ridin' VN1500-B2
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20061205045108.6b3d8633>