Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2002 23:09:34 +0100 From: Udo Erdelhoff <ue@nathan.ruhr.de> To: freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: natd does not work Message-ID: <20020320220934.GJ7195@nathan.ruhr.de> In-Reply-To: <20020320200033.GA1810@fonix.adamsfamily.xx> References: <20020316075540.GA945@fonix.adamsfamily.xx> <20020318134217.V37524-100000@www.freebsdmall.com> <20020320200033.GA1810@fonix.adamsfamily.xx>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Mar 20, 2002 at 09:00:34PM +0100, Szilveszter Adam wrote: > Yes, I think it could use some updating. In fact you get to choose, > either use ppp with -nat or natd, but not both. And if you need tcpmssd to use a lower MTU that that used by the tcpmssfixup option of ppp, you have no choice but to use ipfw and natd. > On the other hand, maybe > I will check with Brian Somers in case he has some compelling reasons to use > the -nat option with ppp:-) There is one very good argumen for ppp -nat: It works with GENERIC, ipfw/natd does not. /s/Udo -- Booze is the answer. I don't remember the question. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020320220934.GJ7195>