Date: Thu, 02 Dec 2021 14:34:44 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: doc@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 255323] handbook: Discourage use of portsnap, document gitup Message-ID: <bug-255323-9-ZOJwv47ljp@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-255323-9@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-255323-9@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D255323 --- Comment #6 from Graham Perrin <grahamperrin@gmail.com> --- (In reply to VVD from comment #2) > gitup is useless=20 Untrue. Too harsh.=20 > too slow.=20 Pros and cons of gitup, including the likelihood of inclusion in base, can = be discussed in FreeBSD Forums, if you like.=20 <https://forums.freebsd.org/posts/544851>:=20 * an explanation for relative slowness when pulling * a quote about future attention to disk performance.=20 ---- For now:=20 * use of gitup is reasonably widespread * the wish for documentation is reasonable. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-255323-9-ZOJwv47ljp>