Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2002 23:48:29 -0700 (MST) From: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com> To: tlambert2@mindspring.com Cc: rittle@labs.mot.com, current@freebsd.org, bde@zeta.org.au, dschultz@uclink.Berkeley.EDU Subject: Re: Lack of real long double support Message-ID: <20021028.234829.105188747.imp@bsdimp.com> In-Reply-To: <3DBE2DA1.62B2563B@mindspring.com> References: <20021025182223.D3076-100000@gamplex.bde.org> <200210290211.g9T2BBcP010112@latour.rsch.comm.mot.com> <3DBE2DA1.62B2563B@mindspring.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message: <3DBE2DA1.62B2563B@mindspring.com>
Terry Lambert <tlambert2@mindspring.com> writes:
: I'd like to see Bruce's issues with the 64 bit support taken care
: of with long double (and the implicit cast that occurs in the one
: case that Bruce complained about in his email, where there is *too
: much* precision on the rvalue, which is a computation of dobule
: operands done in long double form, with a double result).
I'd like to see these fixed too. Now that I understand why I was
deluded into thinking that he was mistaken, I'd like to get these
issues resolved.
Warner
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20021028.234829.105188747.imp>