Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2004 14:41:11 -0700 (PDT) From: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> Cc: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com> Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/boot/i386/boot0 Makefile boot0.sboot0_512.s boot0sio.s Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0404271439240.48609-100000@InterJet.elischer.org> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0404271435410.48609-100000@InterJet.elischer.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
errr..
On Tue, 27 Apr 2004, Julian Elischer wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, 27 Apr 2004, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
>
> > In message <20040427.131322.102770380.imp@bsdimp.com>, "M. Warner Losh" writes:
> >
> > >Shouldn't this be boot0_512.S since it is pre-processed?
>
> It has been the convention since before I made the first bootblocks.
^ generic
obviously there were bootblocks befoe that.. I ported teh MACH
bootblocks and one of the things I had to do was to
fiddle with filenames from .s to .S and change the comments to suit.
Gosh that was a long time ago...
> The Makefiles know how to produce a .s from a .S using the C
> preprocessor.
> (or did I get this the other way around :-)
>
> >
> > If we have such a convention: yes. I wasn't aware of it.
> >
> > --
> > Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
> > phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956
> > FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe
> > Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
> >
>
>
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0404271439240.48609-100000>