Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2004 14:20:07 +0100 From: Ivan Voras <ivoras@fer.hr> To: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: gvinum panic? Message-ID: <41A33907.5020703@fer.hr> In-Reply-To: <20041122215228.J568@korben.in.tern> References: <41A2488F.8030802@fer.hr> <20041122215228.J568@korben.in.tern>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Lukas Ertl wrote: > On Mon, 22 Nov 2004, Ivan Voras wrote: > >> I'm consistently getting a system panic, trap #12 in process g_event >> when I try: > > > Are you sure that kernel (modules) and userland are in sync? Thanks, it looks like they've been unsynced for a while :( It's ok now. But, the performance is pretty bad (same with regular vinum). I tried setting up graid3 class with same parameters, and got these results: linear read (1024 MB file, blocks of 32768) ................. 38.5 MB/s linear write (1024 MB file, blocks of 32768) ................ 16.8 MB/s random read (1024 MB file, blocks of 32768) ................. 41.9 MB/s random write (1024 MB file, blocks of 32768) ................ 3.4 MB/s with raid5, gvinum or vinum, I get these: linear read (1024 MB file, blocks of 32768) ................. 27.8 MB/s linear write (1024 MB file, blocks of 32768) ................ 4.2 MB/s random read (1024 MB file, blocks of 32768) ................. 44.2 MB/s random write (1024 MB file, blocks of 32768) ................ 1.9 MB/s (random reads are really random, no clustering or anything). My setup is 2 IDE channels with three discs, so one is a slave (and contains the parity disc in case of raid3). Do these numbers make sense? I'll certainly go with raid3 as it is...
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?41A33907.5020703>