Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 19 Jul 2010 17:22:10 -0500
From:      Adam Vande More <amvandemore@gmail.com>
To:        Garrett Moore <garrettmoore@gmail.com>
Cc:        freebsd-stable <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>, John Hawkes-Reed <hirez@libeljournal.com>
Subject:   Re: Problems replacing failing drive in ZFS pool
Message-ID:  <AANLkTinG0k8oi_eTBNsKES9Gt2qXEvDGz6pwAp-kUeSg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTinnAxJxARcJrDgYxnpql2n2a_6bQc7fSuZLAzuF@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <AANLkTimOrwHe7xiwoap2H2mUtA7vU6TjENkPC4yJ02_z@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTimOIgCIO4txpPeeoMrRSYAqM25V7cm-h7djmZUC@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTikPOgIqkm3GhIsEnvuvEHvlc44cnh6GJQ1k7Ja_@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTimgi2Btzv9krZZPHCPiyCcwtQyF72BmRzA1kuvi@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTinm-kYD2vwTBCh49AeU0oxuPSOPXjusMa3FGk1h@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTikPJDoiTUwNHVtTDiFMdFkm6v6_ra8JYkuChBJC@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTikCCmGmIcRpj7gjnRBEfLE40IjOmelMYu9WkSUO@mail.gmail.com> <4C44B104.2050000@libeljournal.com> <AANLkTinnAxJxARcJrDgYxnpql2n2a_6bQc7fSuZLAzuF@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 5:04 PM, Garrett Moore <garrettmoore@gmail.com>wrote:

> Well, hotswapping worked, but now I have a totally different problem. Just
> for reference:
> # zpool offline tank da3
> # camcontrol stop da3
> <swap drive>
> # camcontrol rescan all
> <'da3 lost device, removing device entry'>
> # camcontrol rescan all
> <'da3 at mpt0 ...', so new drive was found! yay>
> # zpool replace tank da3
> *cannot replace da3 with da3: device is too small*
>
> So I looked at the smartctl output for the old and new drive. Old:
> Device Model:     WDC WD15EADS-00P8B0
> Serial Number:    WD-WMAVU0087717
> Firmware Version: 01.00A01
> User Capacity:    1,500,301,910,016 bytes
>
> New:
> Device Model:     WDC WD15EADS-00R6B0
> Serial Number:    WD-WCAVY4770428
> Firmware Version: 01.00A01
> User Capacity:    1,500,300,828,160 bytes
>
> God damnit, Western Digital. What can I do now? It's such a small
> difference, is there a way I can work around this?


Uff da, I'm pretty sure the answer is no, you would have had to use the
smallest device first when creating the pool I think.


> My other replacement
> drive is the "00R6B0" drive model as well, with the slightly smaller
> capacity.
>



-- 
Adam Vande More



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?AANLkTinG0k8oi_eTBNsKES9Gt2qXEvDGz6pwAp-kUeSg>