Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2000 14:39:51 +0100 (CET) From: Nick Hibma <n_hibma@webweaving.org> To: Peter Wemm <peter@netplex.com.au> Cc: Nate Williams <nate@mt.sri.com>, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: USB vs. parallel port Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.20.0001061439190.2976-100000@localhost> In-Reply-To: <20000105153241.B0DC21CCE@overcee.netplex.com.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Except that I doubt whether UHCI will survive USB2.0. Nick On Wed, 5 Jan 2000, Peter Wemm wrote: > Nick Hibma wrote: > > > By the way, at the moment it is better to have a UHCI controller on > > your motherboard. Allthough the OHCI controller is much smarter and more > > efficient, support for it is not as stable as the support for UHCI > > controllers. > > Sounds like UHCI => IDE, OHCI => SCSI ? (only 1/2 :-). > > Cheers, > -Peter > > -- n_hibma@webweaving.org n_hibma@freebsd.org USB project http://www.etla.net/~n_hibma/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.20.0001061439190.2976-100000>