Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2018 00:59:45 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 234106] nfsv4 server ignores nfs_reserved_port_only="YES" Message-ID: <bug-234106-227-ffmiZiqIec@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-234106-227@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-234106-227@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D234106 Rick Macklem <rmacklem@FreeBSD.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|New |Open --- Comment #5 from Rick Macklem <rmacklem@FreeBSD.org> --- Yes. If Linux has chosen to go this way, then I think changing it is appropriate. I'll ask the "collective" on the freebsd-current@ mailing list. (Whether we like it or not, Linux is now the defacto standard NFS implementation.) Btw, if you want to test it, the patch is trivial. Just change the line in sys/fs/nfsserver/nfs_nfsdkrpc.c (at line# 169 in head) from if (nfs_privport && (nd.nd_flag & ND_NFSV4) =3D=3D 0) { to if (nfs_privport !=3D 0) { I'll need to test to make sure the FreeBSD NFSv4 client can still do mounts. (I think it must or someone would have noticed a problem mounting a Linux server.) rick --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-234106-227-ffmiZiqIec>