Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 3 Apr 2012 17:29:31 +0000 (UTC)
From:      jb <jb.1234abcd@gmail.com>
To:        freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Using TMPFS for /tmp and /var/run?
Message-ID:  <loom.20120403T192619-21@post.gmane.org>
References:  <4F746F1E.6090702@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de> <4F74BCE8.2030802@vangyzen.net> <CACM2%2B-7Ahn6J=CTASe0g48%2BSD2vvLVd_hG3DRZmvO31QszG5Xw@mail.gmail.com> <20120330.151848.41706133.sthaug@nethelp.no> <CADGWnjXj5W_UCHPExNjxHgq3EZHP1GwocnK4kOHLch5y3gNG0A@mail.gmail.com> <4F765682.5040707@gmail.com> <20120401134025.GC76647@in-addr.com> <20120401161504.49003b73@linux-wb36.example.org> <loom.20120401T215036-109@post.gmane.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
jb <jb.1234abcd <at> gmail.com> writes:

> ... 
> There are memory management subsystem considerations against utilizing
> tmpfs (memory + swap) for /tmp:
> ...
> - Out-of-Memory (OOM) killer
>   Due to it, on heavy loaded systems processes dying on memory pressure.

- Pterodactyl
  The next MM subsystem feature.
  An urban legend ... The final frontier ...

jb





Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?loom.20120403T192619-21>