Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2012 17:29:31 +0000 (UTC) From: jb <jb.1234abcd@gmail.com> To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Using TMPFS for /tmp and /var/run? Message-ID: <loom.20120403T192619-21@post.gmane.org> References: <4F746F1E.6090702@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de> <4F74BCE8.2030802@vangyzen.net> <CACM2%2B-7Ahn6J=CTASe0g48%2BSD2vvLVd_hG3DRZmvO31QszG5Xw@mail.gmail.com> <20120330.151848.41706133.sthaug@nethelp.no> <CADGWnjXj5W_UCHPExNjxHgq3EZHP1GwocnK4kOHLch5y3gNG0A@mail.gmail.com> <4F765682.5040707@gmail.com> <20120401134025.GC76647@in-addr.com> <20120401161504.49003b73@linux-wb36.example.org> <loom.20120401T215036-109@post.gmane.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
jb <jb.1234abcd <at> gmail.com> writes: > ... > There are memory management subsystem considerations against utilizing > tmpfs (memory + swap) for /tmp: > ... > - Out-of-Memory (OOM) killer > Due to it, on heavy loaded systems processes dying on memory pressure. - Pterodactyl The next MM subsystem feature. An urban legend ... The final frontier ... jb
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?loom.20120403T192619-21>