Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 22 Feb 2004 19:31:40 +0300
From:      Gleb Smirnoff <glebius@cell.sick.ru>
To:        Vasenin Alexander aka BlackSir <blacksir@number.ru>
Cc:        freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: ng_netflow: testers are welcome
Message-ID:  <20040222163140.GA66213@cell.sick.ru>
In-Reply-To: <NKEJKOHEKMBIMCCEHEPKGEOFCEAA.blacksir@number.ru>
References:  <20040221235815.GA62385@cell.sick.ru> <NKEJKOHEKMBIMCCEHEPKGEOFCEAA.blacksir@number.ru>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Feb 22, 2004 at 04:43:40PM +0300, Vasenin Alexander aka BlackSir wrote:
V> Yep... But it not so obvious for man like me, who thought just a week ago
V> that netgraph is something beetween net & graphics... like MRTG
V> LOL
V> 
V> Another question:
V> Is is possible that ng_netflow take packets _after_ they are diverted by
V> natd? I apologise, that this would require divert implemented as netgraph
V> node? So... I have no idea how this would work with ipfw ruleset... Any
V> ideas?

The only known workaround is connecting ng_netflow to hook "upper" on
inner interface of masquerading router.

Any better ideas are welcome.

-- 
Totus tuus, Glebius.
GLEBIUS-RIPN GLEB-RIPE



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040222163140.GA66213>