Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2013 11:25:20 -0700 From: Davide Italiano <davide@freebsd.org> To: Vitja Makarov <vitja.makarov@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Question about socket timeouts Message-ID: <CACYV=-EvY4ftxkqCVZDfOW5VW1EA%2Ba%2Bv5twjuGSq%2BQxVWwEJSQ@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CAKGHGPRYyRje2hiq8bW2%2Bi81tHLrFsSw-KYs%2BBHjcr_o0k4qow@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAKGHGPS=HCYfXxPXuUz5G83j5sGieejPU-QHmi9TrmMhmweHLw@mail.gmail.com> <201308221408.08203.jhb@freebsd.org> <CAKGHGPSYxmVoet8TnbxVFeEVk9CeD5iF6DK2do3w_ScnPU_SpQ@mail.gmail.com> <201308230945.28701.jhb@freebsd.org> <CACYV=-FKAn3Mot2F%2Bko%2BNRfLiRC0ZCJcFc5W%2BFwOghngJY88EA@mail.gmail.com> <CAKGHGPRYyRje2hiq8bW2%2Bi81tHLrFsSw-KYs%2BBHjcr_o0k4qow@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 7:04 AM, Vitja Makarov <vitja.makarov@gmail.com> wrote: > 2013/8/23 Davide Italiano <davide@freebsd.org>: > > I think that for socket's timeouts it's ok to have a HZ-precision. It > would be much more important to implement high-precision timeouts for > select() and friends, if it's not done yet (sorry I'm running 9.1). > JFYI, select()/usleep()/etc... are all fine grained right now in HEAD. > > -- > vitja. -- Davide "There are no solved problems; there are only problems that are more or less solved" -- Henri Poincare
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CACYV=-EvY4ftxkqCVZDfOW5VW1EA%2Ba%2Bv5twjuGSq%2BQxVWwEJSQ>