Date: Sat, 09 May 2020 20:50:47 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: powerpc@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 246194] math/blis: pacify portlint, add test target, optimize for power9 Message-ID: <bug-246194-25139-5vCTR9Qk7H@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-246194-25139@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-246194-25139@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D246194 Johannes M Dieterich <jmd@freebsd.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|New |In Progress --- Comment #1 from Johannes M Dieterich <jmd@freebsd.org> --- No objections to 1-3, 5. 4: are these generations supported by powerpc64? If so, can we add fallback= to generic? That should work by introducing a "powerpc64" family containing bo= th the family 9 optimized one as well as the generic fallback I'm not a friend of complicating the port too much - I'd rather us use prop= er families for all targets to not run into surprises and be able to distribute the packages. The overhead of having non-applicable kernels compiled and packaged seems tolerable? --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-246194-25139-5vCTR9Qk7H>